|
COMMUNITY
COLUMNIST
Pit-to-pier plan
threatens Hood Canal's health
Bob Dietz
January 18, 2004
Every so often, an article in The Sun reminds me
that I have a file drawer full of information
about an issue of interest, or concern, here in
West Sound. That's what happened Tuesday when I
read the story about the Hood Canal
Environmental Achievement Awards annual luncheon
scheduled for Thursday. This is an especially
significant event this year because of growing
concern about the decline in the quality of that
beautiful waterway and surrounding areas.
So, I sorted through newspaper clippings and
notes from conversations I've had over the past
few months with people who work to protect our
natural resources. Among clippings from The Sun
was an article on the spill of 4,800 gallons of
industrial fuel (like "toothpaste gel") at the
Chevron-Texaco terminal between Seattle and
Everett. No big deal, right? That spill was way
over there on the other side of the Sound.
Wrong. The tide and shifting winds fouled the
Suquamish tribal lands, a highly sensitive area
for shellfish and wildlife. We're talking about
Kitsap County here, not Alaska, or the shoreline
of Spain, or some other distant location.
We need to remember that the impact of oil
spills or strip mining or road building in
forested lands and the many other violations of
the spiritual and moral responsibilities of
stewardship are felt for generations and over
vast territories.
I was reminded of that truth as I found a couple
of sheets of information about the Asarco
smelter in the Tacoma area that was finally
closed in 1985. According to Asarco's own
estimates, it dumped more than 15 million tons
of rocky slag into Commencement Bay to a depth
of 30 feet and more, creating a 23-acre
breakwater peninsula, which has been
disintegrating over the years. All the while,
its infamous smokestack spewed arsenic and lead
on the lawns, gardens and play fields of Ruston
and south Puget Sound.
What was its counter argument when threatened
with closure by the Environmental Protection
Agency in 1983? It said they provided employment
for 500 workers, contributed to the economy of
Pierce County and the slag breakwater provided
safe harbor for small boats! We might add --
sarcastically -- that they continue to provide
employment for workers at taxpayers' expense as
the EPA tries to prevent further oozing of slag
into that bay.
Which brings me to the stack of information I
discovered about the pit-to-pier monstrosity
planned for Hood Canal by Fred Hill Materials.
There were newspaper articles, notes from
conversations with proponents and opponents,
e-mails. ... It's difficult to summarize all
that information and the energy devoted to
trying to protect us from another potential
environmental disaster. But, let me call your
attention to a few shocking facts about planned
violations of Hood Canal some members of Fred
Hill Materials have in mind.
The opening of John Fabian's article on the
subject is a good place to start. Fabian, a
Ph.D. in engineering, former combat pilot and
NASA astronaut, now retired and living in Port
Ludlow, writes, "While much has been written
about current threats to Hood Canal, including
pollution and low oxygen levels, the greatest
threat is still on the horizon, yet very real."
He's referring, of course, to Fred Hill
Materials' plan to build a 4-mile-long conveyor
belt to a 1,000-foot pier and a 900-foot moorage
on the western shores of Hood Canal. They are
already digging in that area, but they claim the
expansion would make them competitive from
Seattle to Singapore. At whose expense? Ours and
our children's, of course.
What will be at risk when 7 million tons of
gravel are shipped out annually by the
745-foot-long ships sailing in and out of the
canal six times a month (look out bridge), fed
by a pit-to-pier mechanical monster operating 24
hours day?
But, hey, the company claims it'll provide some
sand to "restore the habitat" and increase
revenue for Jefferson County. (Oh yes, I'm
guessing it'll also "provide" jobs through the
EPA to clean up the mess 50 years from now.)
There is much more to be said about this
environmental violation of our West Sound. But
I'll need to muddle through more of those notes.
Next time.
BOB DIETZ
columnists@thesunlink.com
|
|