|
“Hood
Canal’s pier of peril”
Gravel miner proposes monstrous moorage for huge
ships, barges plying pristine waters.
By John Fabian
While much has been written about current
threats to Hood Canal, including pollution and
low oxygen levels, the greatest threat is still
on the horizon; yet very real.
This pristine body of water and its
surroundings are in danger of industrialization
and commercial shipping that could forever alter
the tenuous ecological balance of the canal.
Fred Hill Materials (FHM), a Poulsbo sand and
gravel company, has applied for permits to build
a 4-mile long conveyor belt leading to a
1000-foot pier and 900-foot moorage just north
of Thorndyke Bay.
Here, barges carrying 5,000 to 20,000 tons
would be filled with gravel. The largest of
these barges are bigger than any operating in
Puget Sound today - approximately a full acre in
size. That’s the size of an entire football
field, including the end zones.
Yet, that is just the beginning. In a few
years, 60,000 ton ore ships - the size of NATO
aircraft carriers - would begin to enter the
canal for gravel loading at the pier.
It is the size of these enormous vessels that
determines the design height of the pier -
91-feet tall. A nine story industrial pier,
three football fields long, located a mile from
one of the most productive estuaries in Puget
Sound. This would be located, no kidding, on a
rural residential lot
The huge ships and barges would transit the
Hood Canal Bridge congesting traffic and risking
a barge-bridge or ship-bridge collision that
could destroy the sole lifeline to the Olympic
Peninsula. While FHM has said that all barges
would pass beneath the elevated portion of the
bridge, logic, history and prudence say
otherwise.
While FHM has acknowledged that gravel will be
shipped to regional and west coast markets,
documents the firm provided to the Governor’s
office in 2001 claimed that the project would
make them economically competitive from Seattle
to Singapore.
Ships and barges may bring all of the pollution
and contamination concerns common to every
harbor in the world - Oil, diesel and gravel
spills, 24/7 noise, dust and carcinogenic diesel
exhaust, and invasive species carried on
international and interstate ships and barges.
All could threaten the future of the canal and
set a dangerous precedent for future
development.
Nearly 30 years ago, a similar, but smaller,
project was approved by Mason County at the
mouth of the Hamma Hamma River. Fortunately,
Attorney General Slade Gorton, the Department of
Ecology, and the Hood Canal Environmental
Council successfully appealed the decision to
the Shorelines Hearings Board.
A critical part of the State’s argument was
stated thus: “It is the contention of the
appellants that the proposed project would
establish a significant precedent affecting the
land uses of a prime estuarine area of Hood
Canal and as well the fundamental recreational
character of Hood Canal.”
That wise decision saved the canal and its
surrounding environment for future generations.
Today, the same issues must be considered anew.
The current proposal must be critically
evaluated to protect the public’s interest in
the canal and ensure that all environmental
factors are considered.
In the upland area, wetlands, lakes and streams
form the natural habitat and spawning grounds
for countless species. The shoreline is
designated as a “Shoreline of Statewide
Significance” and as “Conservancy” in the
Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. The
pier site is rich with sand dollar beds,
geoducks, clams, and other shellfish. There are
salmon runs and eelgrass beds along the beach.
It is also home to eagles, herons, osprey, hawks
and other wildlife. The public’s interest is
wide and must be carefully protected.
This project will probably be in the permitting
stage for years. While a number of State and
Federal agencies will have to rule on the
advisability of such a huge project, so will
officials in Jefferson County. Will they learn
from the lessons of Mason County and the Hamma
Hamma River permits?
Already, the Jefferson County Commissioners
have approved, for FHM, a 690-acre mineral
resource land (MRL) overlay designation that
facilitates the gravel strip mining operation.
Ultimately, every year, seven to 10-million tons
of gravel would be mined, crushed and sent down
the conveyor belt to the pier and waiting ships
and barges.
Many local and regional citizens have joined in
opposition to this "Pit-to-Pier" project. The
leading organization is the Hood Canal Coalition
which has grown to over 2000 individual members
in the past 18 months. Also involved in the
opposition are 40 environmental, community,
political, business, and sporting organizations.
The ultimate decision on the Pit-to-Pier
project will not affect only those who live on
or near Hood Canal. As a result, the Hood Canal
Coalition through many of its partner
organizations, is expanding the scope of its
membership recruiting efforts. Decision makers
in Olympia and Washington DC need to sense that
the citizens of our state do not support, and
will not welcome, this massive destruction of
one our most precious natural wonders.
Interested citizens can find more descriptive
material at www.hoodcanalcoalition.org.
John Fabian, who holds a PhD in engineering
from the University of Washington, has served as
an Air Force combat pilot and NASA astronaut on
two space shuttle missions. After his military
career, he headed a large research institute in
Washington D.C. Now retired, he lives in Port
Ludlow. More information from the Hood Canal
Coalition can be obtained at
www.hoodcanalcoalition.org. |
|