Shine Pit meeting draws another
large crowd
Thursday, June 10, 2004
By Sarah J. Bell
Leader Staff Writer
Nearly 350 people
entered the Chimacum High School auditorium
Wednesday evening – some to express their
support, but most to voice their displeasure
with Fred Hill Materials' proposal to expand its
gravel mining operation.
Fred Hill Materials is seeking a Mineral Lands
Overlay (MLO) to redesignate 698 acres a Mineral
Resource Land (MRL) in the Shine area south of
State Route 104.
The county commissioners approved the issue in
2002.
The Western Washington Growth Management
Hearings Board had ruled that the county acted
properly in approving a Mineral Resource Lands (MRL)
request, but still needed to conduct further
environmental analysis to substantiate that
decision. Wednesday's hearing was part of that
process.
In a continuation from a May 25 hearing that was
ended when more people arrived than could be
seated in the Jefferson County Superior
Courtroom, the June 9 hearing had room for about
400 people.
Since May 25, 113 letters were received by the
Jefferson County Commissioners, 111 in protest
of the proposed overlay.
A majority of attendees expressed concern with
the dying waters of the Hood Canal, with
depleted oxygen issues causing fish kills. Also,
people noted the proposed pit-to-pier project
would increase the risk of barge or boat
accidents involving the Hood Canal Bridge. Many
people remain convinced the MLO and the
pit-to-pier projects were linked.
U.S. Congressman Norm Dicks (D-Bremerton) sent
Tom Luce, an administrative assistant, to read a
letter Dicks had written against the MRL and
pit-to-pier.
"The board cannot consider the MRL as an
isolated action," Dicks stated in the letter. "I
fear the project will unalterably change the
Hood Canal."
The pit-to-pier project, which would allow
gravel and sand shipments by barge instead of
only by truck, is not technically part of the
MRL discussion. The pit-to-pier project
application is proceeding on its own schedule,
and a final decision on that is to be made by
state and county staff, not elected officials.
That decision is several years away, according
to county and FHM officials.
Also on hand were members of local Teamsters
Union 589, Fred Hill Materials, the Hood Canal
Coalition and the Sierra Club.
James Tracy, attorney for Fred Hill Materials
supported the county staff report that endorses
the MRL of 690 acres.
"The MRL is not linked to the pit-to-pier,"
Tracy said. "This was utilized (by the Hood
Canal Coalition) to inflame the public instead
of to inform."
Many members of the crowd accused the
commissioners of lacking neutrality and
attempting to quiet constituents opposed to the
gravel mining expansion.
Huntingford said the Jefferson County Board of
Commissioners will make its decision about the
MRL in the next two weeks.